Plan and Site Fact Not Linked
CriticalWorks are recorded at a different level of detail than the estimate and schedule.
- Consequences
- Delays and losses are identified late.
How to integrate the bill of quantities, schedule, contractors, site, quality and billing into a single project control process
In this business area, the greatest value will be created by integrated construction project control. It is recommended to start with a clearly limited first process and expand the solution in stages.
The contractor's operating model is based on work packages, to which quantities, timelines, subcontractors, materials, quality requirements and commercial terms are assigned. The digital process must maintain the same package from estimate to acceptance and completion recording.
The schedule is constantly affected by design decisions, supply, weather conditions, crew capacities and work by other contractors.
Information quality and timelines depend on the work discipline of many external teams.
A technical change can alter the price, timeline, material requirements and responsibility.
The most valuable information arises at the workplace, so the process must work on mobile and without complicated re-entry.
Contractors are moving from document accumulation to real-time project control, where site actuals are linked to schedule, budget, changes and reporting. The greatest practical value today is created by mobile data capture and a unified work structure.
Quantities, work packages, deadlines, risks and commercial assumptions are estimated.
Detailed schedule, procurement, subcontractors, teams and information requirements are specified.
Work packages are assigned to responsible teams with relevant drawings, quantities and deadlines.
Progress, consumed materials, obstacles, inspections, defects and changes are recorded.
Actual quantities, proof of completion, additional works and invoices are confirmed.
Defects are closed, documents are handed over and warranty obligation history is managed.
Tasks, progress, changes, inspections and proof of completion are communicated verbally, via messages or paper forms, leaving no reliable project actuals.
Schedules, tasks, photographs, changes and reports are managed through different channels.
Separate estimating, project and construction site systems are used, but plan versus actuals are reconciled manually between them.
Task, progress, quality, change and acceptance are linked to the same work package.
Schedule, quantities, costs, changes and invoicing are updated quickly enough for decision-making during the project.
Historical data and AI help anticipate delay, margin, supply and quality risks across different projects.
Project margin is lost when construction site actuals, additional works and quality evidence reach commercial control too late. A mobile workflow for a single work package makes it possible to connect actual completion with acceptance and recording first.
The first priority is a mobile workflow for a single work package from task and current information to progress, quality inspection, acceptance and recording.