Testing, inspection and assessment workflow management system
The specialist tracks the test, inspection or evaluation task and records the data. Checks and technical review are saved to a specific sample or object.
Sampling, transportation, reception, division, storage and destruction are recorded by different means. The risk of sample confusion, improper storage and contesting the result increases.
How the solution works
- Accept the right order and identify the object being evaluated
- Check the suitability of the method, worker and tool
- Perform the work and preserve the original proof
- Evaluate quality control and technical result
- To issue a report of appropriate scope or to pass certification assessment
Key challenges
- It is difficult to trace the transmission of samples, objects and evaluation documents
- Results and equipment data are manually rewritten
Solution capabilities
Sample or object
The laboratory records the reception, condition, division and storage of the sample. The inspector indicates the location and object being inspected, and the audit documents are linked to the organization and the specific assessment task.
Job Eligibility
The specific version of the method, the specialist's authorization and the instrument are checked with the quality source before performance.
Primary data
The result of the device, units, version of the calculation or observation of the inspector is stored with origin. Automatic transmission has a reliable connection to a specific work.
Verification of the outcome
The technical recipient evaluates control data, deviation and required uncertainty. The wrong result is not rewritten with a new one without history.
Report and transmission
The document indicates the actual scope assessed. The compliance statement is based on the applicable specification and decision rule; the certification conclusion is taken separately when required by the scheme.
Business context
- It is difficult to trace the transmission of samples, objects and evaluation documents
- Sampling, transportation, reception, division, storage and destruction are recorded by different means. The risk of sample confusion, improper storage and contesting the result increases.
- Results and equipment data are manually rewritten
- Measurement results, calculations and metadata are transferred from equipment, files or paper forms to reports. The risk of rewriting errors, version inconsistencies and data integrity increases.
- Report data is linked to the evaluated object
- It is important for the client that the result is based on data from a specific sample or object. Linked records and review help to prepare a report and answer a technical question. This facilitates the use of the result according to the agreed purpose and an explanation of possible corrections.
Core features
- Sample or object
- Job Eligibility
- Primary data
- Verification of the outcome
- Report and transmission
Key integrations
- Sources of order and quality
- Scope, version of method, appropriateness of the instrument and authorization are applicable.
- Devices and evaluation evidence
- Primary result, units, object or sample relationship.
- The course of certification or document release
- Properly reviewed result and authorized release response.
Potential impact (%)
The ranges indicate an illustrative relative change in the metric under the stated assumptions. Results depend on the starting position and actual use of the solution. Percentages for different metrics must not be added together.
Errors in rewriting the result
12–42%Decreasing
This illustrative scenario assumes that 30-60% of errors can be addressed through the data and rule checks described. That share is assumed to fall by 40-70%. Company data is needed to verify both the addressable share and the resulting change.
Counting errors found in technical review or post-release that resulted from moving the result to a calculation or report.
Proof Chain Recovery Work
16–42%Decreasing
This illustrative scenario assumes that 40-70% of information searches and repeated cross-checks can be addressed. That share is assumed to fall by 40-60%. Company data is needed to verify both the addressable workload and the resulting change.
Measure working minutes to restore the process of obtaining, processing and reviewing the selected result.
Conditional calculation scenarios. The assumptions have not been validated against client measurements.
When this solution is relevant
- The results of tests or checks are rewritten into reports from individual devices, files and specialist notes.
- It is difficult to trace the result to a specific sample, object and primary observation.
Implementation requirements
Compatible as a sample or assessment object, a version of the method is chosen and primary data are recorded. Technical results are transmitted to an authorised professional who reviews them and makes a report or certification decision.
Further development options
- Additional methods, equipment or assessment types after verification of the primary data and their technical review.