Raw material supplier and alternative material assessment system
The procurement and technical team sees which alternative suppliers of raw materials have already been tested and approved by the customer. This helps prepare for a supply disruption.
The history of samples, tests, approved suppliers, versions of specifications and permitted changes remains in the e-mail. It is difficult to reliably determine at the time of ordering whether a specific product and source of supply are allowed for the customer.
How the solution works
- Critical customer demand is linked to specification, source of production and available suppliers.
- Alternatives are recorded for test demand, sample relationship and customer approval result.
- The procurement team evaluates the permitted sources by real-time, capacity and stock coverage.
- In the disruption scenario, actions are compared and the approved change is transferred to the purchase and to the customer for matching.
Key challenges
- Client-approved materials and alternatives are manually controlled
- Lack of reliable data on supply alternatives and risks
Solution capabilities
Source and Dependence Relationship
Real suppliers, a known source of production and relevant supply conditions are visible to the customer's material.
Alternative testing
The sample, specification and customer test need are linked to a specific alternative and responsible coordinator.
Approval and its limits
The client's decision retains the proof, scope and conditions that require review when changed.
Executing the disorder script
The alternative is evaluated in conjunction with availability, supply term and customer demand time.
Transmission of the decision
The buyer or stock planner receives the approved change and notes whether he has accepted it for execution.
Business context
- Client-approved materials and alternatives are manually controlled
- The history of samples, tests, approved suppliers, versions of specifications and permitted changes remains in the e-mail. It is difficult to reliably determine at the time of ordering whether a specific product and source of supply are allowed for the customer.
- Lack of reliable data on supply alternatives and risks
- The supplier's capacity, term, country, packaging, alternatives and customer dependence are analysed separately. Supply disruption is seen too late and there is no clear approved alternative plan.
- Supply disruption does not necessarily interrupt customer orders
- The alternative only becomes useful when the customer can use it in their production. Pre-tests and approvals allow for faster discussion of the right replacement. The supplier has more options to keep the order, and the customer can prepare for the production without waiting for a new evaluation from the start.
Core features
- Source and Dependence Relationship
- Alternative testing
- Approval and its limits
- Executing the disorder script
- Transmission of the decision
Key integrations
- Enterprise resource planning system (ERP)
- Purchases, suppliers, stocks and customer orders.
- Register of Approvals
- Alternative products and sources are allowed for customers.
- Supplier integrations
- Terms, states and capacity signals.
- Warehouse management system (WMS)
- Stock coverage and reservations.
- Analytical layer
- Calculation of risk scenarios.
Potential impact (%)
The ranges indicate an illustrative relative change in the metric under the stated assumptions. Results depend on the starting position and actual use of the solution. Percentages for different metrics must not be added together.
Part of the critical need without an approved and feasible alternative
2–12%Decreasing
This illustrative scenario assumes that the controls described can address 10-30% of discrepancies. That share is assumed to fall by 20-40%. Company data is needed to verify both the addressable share and the resulting change.
The portion of the selected critical materials and customer demand volume is being calculated, for which no supply alternatives are approved and executed. Unfinished testing or unverified supplier capacity is not yet considered a ready-made alternative.
Active supply disruption scenario preparation time
12–36%Decreasing
This illustrative scenario assumes that 30-60% of manual data entry and handover work can be addressed. That share is assumed to fall by 40-60%. Company data is needed to verify both the addressable workload and the resulting change.
The control scenario measures the gathering of facts and the matching of the action to be performed.
Conditional calculation scenarios. The assumptions have not been validated against client measurements.
When this solution is relevant
- Supply disruptions are seen too late
- It is unclear which customer demand depends on one supplier.
- It is unclear who and by whom approved the alternative substances
- Long and volatile supply terms
- Important imported raw materials
Implementation requirements
For the assessment of supply risk, critical material production sources, customer qualification requirements and the state of validation of alternatives are checked. Purchases assess the duration of substitution, testing and delivery, distinguishing different vendors from independent production capacity.
Further development options
- Control of the completion of an alternative test
- Review of Total Production Source Dependencies