Fleet and equipment management system

The fleet team sees each vehicle, its assignment and readiness for work. Use-limiting changes are passed to planners.

The same unit of property in different registers has unmatched identifiers, designation and sources of technical status. Operations have to check by hand where the property is located and whether it can actually be used for work.

How the solution works

  1. The same unit of property is linked in accounting, maintenance and work planning systems.
  2. Its attribution to a unit, employee, object or job is approved.
  3. The required documentation and technical statuses are verified by the use of a specific asset.
  4. The restriction or removal is passed on to the responsible nomination process.
  5. A history of assignment and readiness is preserved, which can be used for maintenance and analysis.

Key challenges

  • Property data fragmented across multiple systems
  • The terms of the technical documentation and checks are manually managed

Solution capabilities

Asset Unit Data and Responsible Personnel

The asset unit is linked to its codes in different registers. Indicates which system handles each data group.

Designation of transport or equipment for work

A specific unit, location or responsible user and a period of approved assignment are visible.

Validity of documents and checks

Only the documents required for that asset group have the application, deadline and participant responsible for the renewal.

The state of readiness

A technical permit, document restriction, and other prerequisites are provided with their origin; an unknown state is not interpreted as an authorization.

Transfer of Restriction

The planning process is presented with a relevant limitation and confirmation of its removal; the continuity of the change is preserved.

Business context

Property data fragmented across multiple systems
The same unit of property in different registers has unmatched identifiers, designation and sources of technical status. Operations have to check by hand where the property is located and whether it can actually be used for work.
The terms of the technical documentation and checks are manually managed
Checks and documents applied to a particular property have deadlines but their changed state does not reach the assignment for work. A planned unit whose basis of use requires further approval or whose limitation has not yet been removed.
A suitable and prepared vehicle is assigned to the work
The service promised to the customer depends on whether the transport can indeed be used at the scheduled time. Current appointments, documents and restrictions allow the planner to verify this. If the readiness changes, it is possible to combine another tool or execution plan earlier.

Core features

  • Asset Unit Data and Responsible Personnel
  • Designation of transport or equipment for work
  • Validity of documents and checks
  • The state of readiness
  • Transfer of Restriction

Key integrations

Accounting Property Register
Accounting asset number and agreed data related to its use.
Maintenance system or service provider
A true state of technical inaccessibility and return to work.
Sources of documents and checks
Applicable documents, validity and approval of authorized renewal.
Operations Planning Process
Asset assignment, required readiness and reaction to limitation.
Telematics
Local, mileage and working time facts with their relevance are allowed.

Potential impact (%)

The ranges indicate an illustrative relative change in the metric under the stated assumptions. Results depend on the starting position and actual use of the solution. Percentages for different metrics must not be added together.

Asset readiness reconciliation work

16–42%Decreasing

This illustrative scenario assumes that 40-70% of information searches and repeated cross-checks can be addressed. That share is assumed to fall by 40-60%. Company data is needed to verify both the addressable workload and the resulting change.

Employee time is measured by explaining the suitability of a specific unit for assignment.

Appointments with underestimated known restriction

5–25%Decreasing

This illustrative scenario assumes that 20-50% of missed actions can be identified through task and deadline tracking. That share is assumed to fall by 25-50%. Company data is needed to verify both the addressable share and the resulting change.

Corrections to the assignment of this cause are calculated based on the comparable volume of work.

Conditional calculation scenarios. The assumptions have not been validated against client measurements.

When this solution is relevant

  • The same car or technical unit has unrelated records in different systems.
  • Technical restrictions or validity of documents are checked separately from the assignment of property to work.

Implementation requirements

Asset identifiers, appointments and statuses of documents and technical readiness are checked for fleet management. Transmission of register, maintenance and operations data is assessed before justifying the need for a new platform.

Further development options

  • Transmission of Document Renewal from an Approved Service Provider
  • History of the attribution and transfer of assets of additional units

Frequently asked questions

Adapting the solution to your business