Machine design and engineering change management system
Engineers hand over the approved product design for purchase and assembly. Replacing drawings or components can determine which orders and delivered devices need to be reviewed.
The design model, drawing and approved product structure are not tied to a single release state and its application boundary. Purchase and production begin with the availability of non-uniformly approved technical information.
How the solution works
- The constructor prepares an engineering structure with approved models and drawings.
- The technologist links it to purchased parts, kitting groups and manufacturing operations.
- The effect of the change is assessed for open orders and relevant versions produced.
- Authorised professionals approve the release and the specific application limit.
- Production and accounting adopt the approved structure; the unaccepted transfer remains dealt with as an error.
Key challenges
- Drawings, bills of materials and production routings are managed separately
- The engineering composition of the product is incompatible with the production structure
Solution capabilities
Approved design version
The model, drawings and engineering product composition list (BOM) have a common basis for release.
The relationship between engineering and production structure
Engineering parts are linked to procurement objects, assembly groups and operations while preserving reasonable differences.
Impact of a change
Affected documents, open orders and versions are set up that require a separate solution.
Limit of application of the alternative
The equivalent of a component is approved for a specific design and conditions of use.
Release and Acceptance
The system preserves the confirmation as well as the version accepted by the recipient, instead of holding the file upload to a successful application.
Business context
- Drawings, bills of materials and production routings are managed separately
- The design model, drawing and approved product structure are not tied to a single release state and its application boundary. Purchase and production begin with the availability of non-uniformly approved technical information.
- The engineering composition of the product is incompatible with the production structure
- The list of compositions prepared by the designer is passed on to the production without checking the links between procurement objects, collection groups, permitted alternatives and operations. In the production structure, the required part is missing or the change is applied in only one system.
- The price and term of the customer change are discussed in advance
- When the customer changes the requirement, it may be necessary to change parts already ordered or assembly started. The visible influence of the change helps explain the price and the change in delivery date before work is approved. The production and service team receive the same agreed-upon version of the documents.
Core features
- Approved design version
- The relationship between engineering and production structure
- Impact of a change
- Limit of application of the alternative
- Release and Acceptance
Key integrations
- Computer-aided design tools (CAD)
- Models, drawings and engineering structure.
- Enterprise resource planning system (ERP)
- Purchased parts, production positions and open orders.
- Machinery and equipment assembly execution system (MES)
- The version used, the state of the work started and the actual set-up.
- Quality process
- Effects of the change on testing and confirmed technical exceptions.
- Customer Equipment Service Process
- The facts of the defect in operation and the result of performing the change applied.
Potential impact (%)
The ranges indicate an illustrative relative change in the metric under the stated assumptions. Results depend on the starting position and actual use of the solution. Percentages for different metrics must not be added together.
Work on structure reconciliation and transmission repair
6–25%Decreasing
This illustrative scenario assumes that 20-50% of waiting caused by missing information or unclear responsibility can be addressed. That share is assumed to fall by 30-50%. Company data is needed to verify both the addressable share and the resulting change.
The active work of technologists and data administrators for changes of similar scope is compared.
Structure transfer errors detected in production
12–42%Decreasing
This illustrative scenario assumes that 30-60% of errors can be addressed through the data and rule checks described. That share is assumed to fall by 40-70%. Company data is needed to verify both the addressable share and the resulting change.
Counts the cases of missing, incorrect or outdated positions according to the changes made.
Conditional calculation scenarios. The assumptions have not been validated against client measurements.
When this solution is relevant
- In engineering, the approved replacement does not reach the production hub and the operations assigned to it.
- Different teams use a different version of a valid drawing or product structure.
Implementation requirements
For engineering change management, the relationship between design composition, production set-up groups and purchase data is compatible. The impact of the changes on the work started must be traced through the interfaces of the design and ERP systems in use.
Further development options
- Review of the application of the supplier component change
- Service defect link to approved design change