Is it possible to manage multiple types of facility service in one environment?

Yes, objects, employee tasks, schedules and customer notes can be handled in a common environment. For each service, the quality criteria and response procedures that are suitable for it are retained. The implementation evaluates the specialized tools already in use so that cleaning, security or technical support teams receive the functions they need.

How is an employee's arrival checked if the system lacks a tag?

The absence of an entry can mean both a job not done and a communication or data transmission disorder. The responsible employee checks the task with the executor and available proof of performance, and records the set state after the check.

How do you measure the consumption of cleaning products along with the quality of service?

Consumption is compared to the same amount of work and quality requirements. Checks dosing, losses, and manufacturer's instructions for use so that smaller quantities do not impair service.

Who closes the emergency?

According to the event, a team must be appointed and its confirmation received that a response has started. The work performed and their result are checked according to the agreed order of service.

LT Let's Connect

Industry digitalisation analysis

Cleaning, safety and facility service services: digitalization capabilities

Visible quality of service at each facility

Digital maturity Typical digital maturity Shows the level of digitalisation companies in this line of business typically operate at. The assessment considers use of core systems, how far processes are digitalised, integrations, data readiness and advanced use of data. A 3 means ordinary, middling maturity. A 5 is given only where real-time data, automated decisions and advanced optimisation are already a routine part of core operations.: low
Digitalisation potential Digitalisation potential Shows the scale of business impact digitalisation could have in this line of business. It weighs economic leverage, the scope for digital impact, the scale and repetition of processes, value lost today, and the leverage of better data and decisions. A business area’s score is calculated from five weighted dimensions. A sector’s score is derived from the scores of its business areas.: 72/100
Biggest challenge: The scope of the object's works and zone requirements are not managed clearly enough
Biggest opportunity: The coordinator sees where the man is missing or needs to be corrected

Operating model

Cleaning crews, security posts and other service teams perform different tasks at the same facility. The customer is interested in the agreed quality of service and timely resolution of defects.

Cleaning and site maintenance

The work is planned according to zones, surfaces and agreed frequency. The manual checks the quality of performance, and defects are transferred to the responsible brigade for elimination.

Physical security and standby

It is important for the security service to ensure the necessary number of employees in posts, to communicate information in a timely manner, and to respond according to the mandate given.

Multiple contractual object services

The same facility can handle cleaning, security and other teams. Each receives its own schedule, instructions and order of registration of works.

One-time specialized work of the object

The team performs a specific volume order, such as post-construction cleaning. Pre-arranged preparation, work result and conditions for its reception.

Market context

The object servicing company combines the agreed scope of service, staff schedules and customer notifications. Evidence for cleaning, safety and other services is different. The customer needs to see if the agreed works have been done and how the problem has been solved, and the provider needs to ensure a feasible and profitable contract.

Employee AllocationIn the absence of a person, it is necessary to quickly find a suitable deputy and pass instructions for a specific object.
Quality checkThe client and coordinator need to see not only the presence in the facility, but also the result of the agreed works.

Workflow and responsibilities

Scope of the contract

Define zone, frequency, result and response conditions.

Readiness

Designate the right employee and tools.

Execution

The team receives relevant object instructions and records the work actually done.

Quality and Reaction

Check the service's proper result and intercept the incident.

Reconciliation

Employees correct the identified shortcomings, check the transferred measures and provide the actual cost of servicing the contract.

Digital maturity scale

Separate records and manual work

Information is mainly held in separate files or notes. Employees pass it on and reconcile it manually.

Organised data within individual teams Typical current situation

Teams record their work consistently, but sharing information with colleagues still requires considerable manual checking.

Partially integrated systems

Core work is managed in systems. Some information is transferred automatically, but repeated data entry remains.

Coordinated systems and teams

Systems deliver the required data on time. Employees can see unfinished work and know who is responsible for resolving discrepancies.

Continuous measurement and improvement

The team checks data quality, evaluates results and uses them to improve operations. Automation is applied where its value can be demonstrated.

Executive conclusion

Employees must receive clear tasks and the necessary tools. The manager checks the result, and urgent incidents are transmitted directly according to the established response procedures.

Common digitalisation challenges

The scope of the object's works and zone requirements are not managed clearly enough

High

Contracts, zone plans, work frequencies, quality criteria, additional exceptions and customer instructions are kept in documents and employee memory.

Consequences: Employees and the client have different understandings of what needs to be done, and additional unpaid jobs and disputes are increasing.

Employee graphs and changes are managed in a fragmented manner

High

The need for objects, staff competencies, working time limits, leave, absences and transport are planned in different tables or systems.

Consequences: Shifts remain unfilled, with an increase in overtime, urgent calls and service disruptions.

The actual presence of the employee and the start of work are not reliably linked to the schedule

High

Arrivals are marked on paper, messages, a common terminal or in a separate system of working time.

Consequences: The absence is noticed too late, the working time is manually corrected and the customer has difficulty justifying the performance of the service.

Evidence of the work carried out is filled in by hand reports

High

Works, zones, checkpoints, photos, consumables consumed and customer comments are recorded on paper or in several programs.

Consequences: Reports are delayed, information lacks the necessary data, and performance and quality cannot be reliably compared to a contract.

Quality checks are performed unevenly

High

Checklists, evaluation criteria, photographs, rechecks and corrective actions depend on the specific manual or object.

Consequences: It is difficult to compare objects, identify recurring causes and prove quality improvement.

Incidents and escalations do not have a single workflow

High

Incidents of safety, security, quality, or object are recorded by calls, messages, and individual reports.

Consequences: Delays in reaction, unclear responsibilities, and important evidence and corrective actions are lost.

The customer does not see the status of the reliable service and SLA

Medium

Execution of works, inspections, incidents, response time and additional orders are communicated by periodic reports or email.

Consequences: Status requests, disputes are increasing and it is difficult to justify a contractual outcome.

Consuming tools and equipment not linked to the facility's services

Medium

Cleaning aids, uniforms, security equipment, keys or other inventory equipment are operated separately from shifts and work.

Consequences: Stocks are scarce at the wrong time, write-offs are not explained, and the cost of the object becomes inaccurate.

Profitability of object and contract seen too late

Medium

Scheduled and actual hours, no-show changes, overtime, measures, additional work, fines and bills are not linked.

Consequences: Lossy objects and unpaid volume are only seen at the end of the month or even later.

Sprendimai

How to solve these problems

Solution directions linked to specific business area problems they address.

Problem

The scope of the object's works and zone requirements are not managed clearly enough

Employees and the client have different understandings of what needs to be done, and additional unpaid jobs and disputes are increasing.

Solution direction

Facilities service delivery and quality management system