Fishing trip, quota and logbook management system
The team records the catches of the fishing trip and tracks the submission of the required logs. The quota review shows official data and records not yet submitted.
In fishing activities, the vessel's location, tools, species, quantities, landings, quotas, log and first sale pass through several systems. Administration increases, the risk of errors and control discrepancies increases, and profitability of the activity is seen to be late.
How the solution works
- Checking the right of voyage and technical readiness
- Record a catch event with real time and location
- Evaluate the applicable state of resources and quota
- Submit the required log and get a response
- Reconcile unloading records and pass on sales information
Key challenges
- Catch, Quota and Electronic Log Data Duplicate
- The ship's technical readiness fails to reach a voyage decision
Solution capabilities
Conditions for a specific voyage
Marine and inland fishing have different applications: permit, quota and electronic submission requirements are not tracked by a single sector name alone.
Ship readiness
Known failure, necessary maintenance and proper return to work are linked to the voyage decision. Closing the record does not replace real technical verification.
Catch data and traceability
The ship, voyage, location, time, type and quantity maintain a history of correction. Catch estimate and landing measurement have their own meanings.
Monitoring of quota utilization and balance
The official usage, non-transferred records and internal estimate are displayed separately. The late official source is not marked as the exact current balance.
Submission response
The information prepared, sent and accepted by the authority is allocated. The communication disorder has an applied alternative action, not just waiting until it returns to shore.
Business context
- Catch, Quota and Electronic Log Data Duplicate
- In fishing activities, the vessel's location, tools, species, quantities, landings, quotas, log and first sale pass through several systems. Administration increases, the risk of errors and control discrepancies increases, and profitability of the activity is seen to be late.
- The ship's technical readiness fails to reach a voyage decision
- A known technical flaw, the necessary maintenance or a check for correction is not linked to a particular voyage plan. The plan is based on a ship whose fitness for the voyage has not yet been confirmed, or the change has to be combined at the last minute.
- Catch information helps plan implementations more accurately
- The offer for the buyer must be based on actual output and applicable voyage conditions. Linked catch and submission records facilitate data transfer for further accounting. Quota and ship readiness review helps the team evaluate voyage options against relevant official and internal data.
Core features
- Conditions for a specific voyage
- Ship readiness
- Catch data and traceability
- Monitoring of quota utilization and balance
- Submission response
Key integrations
- Vessel, Permit and Maintenance Sources
- Terms and technical readiness for a specific voyage.
- Official record keeping and landing of fisheries
- Applied submission, acceptance response and actual quantity.
Potential impact (%)
The ranges indicate an illustrative relative change in the metric under the stated assumptions. Results depend on the starting position and actual use of the solution. Percentages for different metrics must not be added together.
Catch re-entry work
12–36%Decreasing
This illustrative scenario assumes that 30-60% of manual data entry and handover work can be addressed. That share is assumed to fall by 40-60%. Company data is needed to verify both the addressable workload and the resulting change.
Measure working minutes to re-record the facts of the voyage's catch.
Data transfer error rejected submission
12–42%Decreasing
This illustrative scenario assumes that 30-60% of errors can be addressed through the data and rule checks described. That share is assumed to fall by 40-70%. Company data is needed to verify both the addressable share and the resulting change.
Count submissions rejected due to a pre-verifiable transfer or duplication error.
Conditional calculation scenarios. The assumptions have not been validated against client measurements.
When this solution is relevant
- The company organizes commercial fishing trips and manages catch accounts and quota utilization.
- The catch data is rewritten into multiple logs, and the internal quantities have to be checked against the officially submitted data.
Implementation requirements
For the course of fishing, the activity logs, sources of presentation and ship readiness data are established. Catches and landings must remain traceable without a permanent link, and rejected submissions to receive responsible correction and acceptance confirmation.
Further expansion
- Other vessels or types of fishing after their specific rules and external presentation check.