Electrical and IT goods B2B self-service portal

A business customer finds the equipment, sees the prices applied to it and places an order. If technical advice is required, the specialist receives the customer's demands already made.

The prices and supply conditions of multiple distributors are checked by employees in separate portals and files. Time is lost, a sub-optimal source is chosen or the customer is promised an inaccurate term.

How the solution works

  1. The customer finds the item by code or approved parameters; an unclear choice is reviewed by a specialist.
  2. Price and supply options are checked against a specific customer, quantity and relevant sources.
  3. The choice is passed on to the ordering process, keeping the codes of goods and the approved set.
  4. The client receives the accepted amount, time limit and execution documents; the exception sees with another required action.

Key challenges

  • Supplier prices, balances and terms are seen separately
  • Orders and changes are overwritten between channels

Solution capabilities

Parametric and code search

The customer searches by technical attributes, manufacturer code or approved alternative.

Compatibility and kit verification

Necessary accessories, licenses, power supply or other dependent components are checked prior to ordering.

Customer pricing

Price, discount and commercial rules are obtained from ERP by a specific client or project.

Availability of warehouse and suppliers

The buyer sees the balance of the company's warehouse, the delivery terms of the selected suppliers and the time of updating this data.

Order without overwriting

The approved cart is transferred to the ERP and the status and documents are returned to the customer.

The course of the specialist review

The specialist receives an obscure request along with the parameters chosen by the customer, terms of use and pricing issues.

Business context

Supplier prices, balances and terms are seen separately
The prices and supply conditions of multiple distributors are checked by employees in separate portals and files. Time is lost, a sub-optimal source is chosen or the customer is promised an inaccurate term.
Orders and changes are overwritten between channels
The client file or letter is converted into an order by hand, and subsequent changes are corrected in several places. It is not always clear whether a new version and quantity of the item has reached execution. The command repeatedly checks the codes and corrects duplicates. The customer waits longer for confirmation, and an undetected change can lead to delivery of the wrong equipment.
A convenient addition of equipment for the business customer
It is important for a company that is constantly buying to find agreed prices quickly and to replenish the equipment used. Self-service allows the order to be placed when there is a need. A more complex request reaches a specialist with already collected requirements, so the consultation can proceed immediately from a specific choice.

Core features

  • Parametric and code search
  • Compatibility and kit verification
  • Customer pricing
  • Availability of warehouse and suppliers
  • Order without overwriting
  • The course of the specialist review

Key integrations

Enterprise resource planning system (ERP)
Customer price, order, status and documents.
Product information management system (PIM)
Technical attributes, analogs, sets and documents.
Warehouse management system (WMS)
Local warehouse balance and reservations.
Supplier Integration Layer
Prices, terms and availability.
Customer relationship management system (CRM)
Client account, design prices and specialist review.

Potential impact (%)

The ranges indicate an illustrative relative change in the metric under the stated assumptions. Results depend on the starting position and actual use of the solution. Percentages for different metrics must not be added together.

Employee time for standard order of technical goods

12–36%Decreasing

This illustrative scenario assumes that 30-60% of manual data entry and handover work can be addressed. That share is assumed to fall by 40-60%. Company data is needed to verify both the addressable workload and the resulting change.

All processing and repair times are compared for the same self-service order groups.

Supply bid adjustments for obsolete data

12–42%Decreasing

This illustrative scenario assumes that 30-60% of errors can be addressed through the data and rule checks described. That share is assumed to fall by 40-70%. Company data is needed to verify both the addressable share and the resulting change.

Corrections to the price or term are calculated for an out-of-date source that is already present.

Share of self-service orders completed by purchase

3–12%Increasing

Sample starting part - 50%. Assumption: 15-30% of the remaining cases involve an incomplete self-service order or referral; a solution would help resolve 20-40% of these cases.

Completed purchases are divided by all comparable self-service orders started, including purchases completed with a specialist. The same order is counted once.

Conditional calculation scenarios. The assumptions have not been validated against client measurements.

When this solution is relevant

  • Customers often ask for prices and balances via email
  • Many queries require technical search
  • Many inquiries await the same specialist
  • ERP pricing is achieved through integrations
  • There is a priority product category with reliable attributes
  • Supplier portals are manually checked

Implementation requirements

Technical goods self-service is prepared by customer codes, parameter search, packaging data and approved alternative rules. Order integration must return the price, quantity and deadline confirmed by accounting, and an underdescribed request is forwarded to a technical specialist.

Further development options

  • Checking the customer list of goods before order
  • Harmonization of alternatives to unconfirmed supplier quantities

Frequently asked questions

Adapting the solution to your business