Metal product quality and traceability system
The quality worker finds used material certificates and test results for the product. Client documents can be collected according to specific workpieces and works performed.
Dimensions and test results are not always linked to a specific element, the requirement applied and the control phase. It takes release decision and preparation of client documents; the cause of repeated nonconformity is difficult to verify.
How the solution works
- The accepted material is linked to the batch or melt identifier and certificate.
- When cutting or joining elements, it is recorded what materials they are made of and what operations have been performed.
- Measurement or testing is assessed against the requirement for a specific element.
- In case of non-compliance, the elements involved are identified and a follow-up action is confirmed.
- The release decision and the documentation required by the client are prepared from verified communications.
Key challenges
- Quality control is disconnected from production
- Limited batch and component traceability
Solution capabilities
Material Certificate Relationship
The original document is linked to the resulting batch or melt, not just the overall material on the mark.
Connection after cutting and assembly
The part, the workpiece group and the appropriate cut-off retain the identifier of the starting material according to the selected traceability detail.
Control plan and results
The dimension or test has a version of the applicable drawing and control requirement.
Welding evidence
Where relevant, the specific seam or element is linked to the performer, the procedure used and the test result.
Nonconformity and release
The scope of the restriction, the assessor and the approved result are passed on to production and storage.
Client Document Package
Only evidence belonging to a specific product and required on request is collected.
Business context
- Quality control is disconnected from production
- Dimensions and test results are not always linked to a specific element, the requirement applied and the control phase. It takes release decision and preparation of client documents; the cause of repeated nonconformity is difficult to verify.
- Limited batch and component traceability
- It is not always possible to quickly restore the whole connection: a drawing version, a batch of material and a certificate, a CNC program, operations, welding data and a quality protocol. During non-compliance, it takes a while to recover which products used the material of a specific melt or workpiece.
- Documents confirm the origin of the delivered part
- The acceptance of the buyer may depend on the fact that a certificate of the material used is provided and the results of the necessary checks. The associated traceability chain helps to prepare delivery documents. The customer can check the shipment more quickly, and the supplier can respond specifically to the technical claim.
Core features
- Material Certificate Relationship
- Connection after cutting and assembly
- Control plan and results
- Welding evidence
- Nonconformity and release
- Client Document Package
Key integrations
- Warehouse and accounting systems
- Actual batches of materials, movement of elements and approved restrictions.
- Metalworking manufacturing execution system (MES)
- Cutting, welding, assembly and external processing facts.
- Sources of documents and qualifications
- Original certifications, procedures and endorsements for a particular job.
- Measuring and testing instruments
- Results with a relationship between element, method and requirement.
- Process of Technological Change
- The drawing has been approved and is subject to a control plan.
Potential impact (%)
The ranges indicate an illustrative relative change in the metric under the stated assumptions. Results depend on the starting position and actual use of the solution. Percentages for different metrics must not be added together.
Preparation of the client's documentation package
12–36%Decreasing
This illustrative scenario assumes that 30-60% of manual data entry and handover work can be addressed. That share is assumed to fall by 40-60%. Company data is needed to verify both the addressable workload and the resulting change.
The employee's time is compared for orders that require a similar amount of paperwork, including post-submission corrections.
Search duration for items affected by non-compliance
16–42%Decreasing
This illustrative scenario assumes that 40-70% of information searches and repeated cross-checks can be addressed. That share is assumed to fall by 40-60%. Company data is needed to verify both the addressable workload and the resulting change.
Traceability studies together assess the duration of the search and the completeness of the verified links between materials and products.
Conditional calculation scenarios. The assumptions have not been validated against client measurements.
When this solution is relevant
- A certificate of material for the client is found, but it is unclear if it belongs to the workpiece actually used.
- In a non-conformity study, it is difficult to determine which elements are covered by a common circumstance of welding, processing or testing.
Implementation requirements
Compatible material certifications, cutting records, scrap accounting and final element codes. Quality specialists determine how to find affected products based on this data and what welding and testing documents they need.
Further development options
- Linking customer comments to the submitted version of the package
- Acceptance of subcontracted processing documents