Is one order queue suitable for all power models?

Only if it matches the actual work. Contract preparation of portions and individual delivery order have different scopes and deadlines.

Does the prescription information guarantee safety for an allergic person?

It is a necessary part of the information. Control of substitutions and cross contact in the kitchen is assessed separately.

When is a separate shift optimization needed?

When proper demand assessment makes a significant difference and existing charting tools do not include it. Known orders and manual rules may be sufficient.

How do you compare the profitability of direct orders and intermediary channels?

It is necessary to compare attraction, payments, packaging, delivery and service. The absence of a platform commission does not prove this in itself.

LT Let's Connect

Industry digitalisation analysis

Restaurants and catering companies: an analysis of digitalization

Better service readiness and less food loss

Digital maturity Typical digital maturity Shows the level of digitalisation companies in this line of business typically operate at. The assessment considers use of core systems, how far processes are digitalised, integrations, data readiness and advanced use of data. A 3 means ordinary, middling maturity. A 5 is given only where real-time data, automated decisions and advanced optimisation are already a routine part of core operations.: medium
Digitalisation potential Digitalisation potential Shows the scale of business impact digitalisation could have in this line of business. It weighs economic leverage, the scope for digital impact, the scale and repetition of processes, value lost today, and the leverage of better data and decisions. A business area’s score is calculated from five weighted dimensions. A sector’s score is derived from the scores of its business areas.: 80/100
Biggest challenge: Channels promise more orders than kitchen can accept
Biggest opportunity: The kitchen is prepared according to expected orders

Operating model

The restaurant combines menus, ingredients, shifts and order preparation. Service in the hall, for take-away and delivery can use the same kitchen, so the load needs to be assessed together.

Restaurant or cafe with on-site service

Guests book at the tables, and the kitchen combines the preparation of different dishes and the order of presentation. The load of work depends on the tables, menus and order time taken.

Multi-Department Catering Network

The network coordinates menus, purchases, and performance indicators. Unit recipes or suppliers may vary, so everyone must get information approved for them.

Delivery and take-away kitchen

The kitchen simultaneously receives orders from multiple channels. The team combines preparation time, packaging and transfer to the customer or courier.

Contract and event catering

The company produces a pre-agreed amount of portions for a specific time and place. Special nutritional needs, delivery and service people are planned.

Market context

The restaurant combines hall, take-away and delivery orders with the capacity of the kitchen. Prices, portions and losses of ingredients affect the cost of meals. It is important for the customer to get an agreed order on time, and for the company to maintain the quality of service and earnings in different sales channels.

Multiple order channelsHalls, take-aways and delivery orders may require the same kitchen and staff.
Short Validity of Raw MaterialsToo much prepared quantity increases losses while too little hinders service demand.

Workflow and responsibilities

Menu and need

Compatible recipe, information for the customer and volume of future production.

Preparation

Raw materials and shift are prepared according to a real need for work and food safety.

Order acceptance

The channel gets a feasible time and the allowed choice of dish.

Production and transmission

The workstations match the parts of the order as well as the actual issue.

Consumption verification

Stocks and waste are measured by clear units and reasons.

Digital maturity scale

Separate records and manual work

Information is mainly held in separate files or notes. Employees pass it on and reconcile it manually.

Organised data within individual teams

Teams record their work consistently, but sharing information with colleagues still requires considerable manual checking.

Partially integrated systems

Core work is managed in systems. Some information is transferred automatically, but repeated data entry remains.

Coordinated systems and teams

Systems deliver the required data on time. Employees can see unfinished work and know who is responsible for resolving discrepancies.

Continuous measurement and improvement

The team checks data quality, evaluates results and uses them to improve operations. Automation is applied where its value can be demonstrated.

Executive conclusion

The relevant menu and real kitchen capacity help the customer promise a feasible time. Actual consumption of ingredients and write-downs allow for a more accurate assessment of the cost of dishes.

Common digitalisation challenges

Channels promise more orders than kitchen can accept

High

Hall, pick-up and delivery take orders within separate or outdated time limits.

Consequences: The customer is promised an unfeasible time even before the order enters production.

Direct ordering channel weaker than delivery platforms

High

Own channel often does not have the same comfortable menu, real preparation time, payment, loyalty and order states.

Consequences: The share of platform commissions increases, and the restaurant loses its direct relationship with the customer.

Menu pricing and profitability are assessed late

High

Sales, prescription cost, platform commissions, discounts, working hours and write-downs are analysed separately.

Consequences: Popular dishes may not be profitable enough, and changes to prices or menus are made too late.

Employee graphs don't respond well to channel demand

High

Reservations, delivery orders, events, complexity of dishes and employee competencies are planned in different tools.

Consequences: Some hours there is a shortage of staff, others do not use their capacity and service quality fluctuates.

Order disruptions are dealt with manually

High

Delays, no longer available meals, courier problems and customer changes are transmitted over the phone or on different platforms.

Consequences: The client gets information late, employees duplicate actions and it is difficult to control the causes of compensation.

Menus, recipes, allergens and prices do not match between channels

High

Dishes, modifiers, recipes, allergens, photos and prices are separately maintained on POS, delivery platforms, QR menus and the website.

Consequences: Customers receive inaccurate information, the kitchen is faced with unexecutable orders, and changes take time.

Accepted orders do not match between kitchen jobs

High

Hot meals, cold snacks and packing work do not have a concerted course and relevant readiness.

Consequences: One part of the order is waiting for the other, being re-produced or transferred at the wrong time.

Ingredient consumption and food waste are seen late

High

The theoretical consumption of recipes, actual portions, write-downs, spoilage and discarded food are not consistently recorded.

Consequences: It is difficult to control the cost of dishes, purchases, portions and the result of reducing food waste.

Guest profile and order history fragmented

Medium

Reservations, hall purchases, delivery orders, loyalty, reviews and consents are stored in different systems.

Consequences: It is difficult to recognize the returning customer, solve recurring problems and offer a suitable re-offer.

Rules for Collections and Attachments do not access channels correctly

Medium

The choice of accessories, the composition of the kit and the combinations allowed are maintained separately without being linked to the relevant version of the dish.

Consequences: The customer orders an impossible combination, and the kitchen and cash register corrects his choice.

Opportunities

Opportunities to improve operations

Restaurant ingredient cost and waste analytics systemHigh impactThe difference in consumption is assessed together with the facts of the recipe, the yield and the movement.A manager can more quickly identify the cause and direct the action to a purchase, portion or preparation problem.

Restaurant shift and kitchen work planning systemHigh impactThe known nature of orders is tied in advance to jobs and required competencies.There is a decrease in emergency shift changes and the prepared capacity is better suited to the actual load on the kitchen.

Restaurant menu, recipe and allergen management systemHigh impactThe change of the recipe has a clear valid version and a state of transmission to channels.The team updates the menu faster and can respond if the purchase channel still displays an out-of-date composition.

Restaurant direct ordering and loyalty portalHigh impactThe customer's order is transmitted with proper codes for dishes and accessories.Manual overwriting is reduced, and checks on payment and kitchen acceptance allow faster non-transferred order identification.

Restaurant order and kitchen management systemHigh impactOrder reception and sequence of works are based on a real kitchen load.The team can adjust the promised time earlier and combine jobs, reducing delays and repetitive production due to transmission errors.

Biggest opportunity

The kitchen is prepared according to expected orders

The manager plans the quantities, stocks and shift that are being prepared by sales. By comparing the actual consumption of ingredients to prescriptions, he can determine the causes of excess preparation, write-offs or cost differences.

Less manual transfer of orders
More accurate addition of raw materials
Clearer reasons for write-offs
The guest order is easier to fulfill according to the approved menu and kitchen options

Business impact assessment

Potential operational benefitsRelevant menus, actually prepared dishes and the cost of ingredients help reduce repairs and waste.
Why the problem mattersThe high shift load and short raw material validity increase the cost of planning and transmission errors.
Implementation dependenciesThe complexity is increased by changes in dishes, allergens, kitchen capacity and sales channels.
The customer returns to book comfortablyDirect order and clear preparation information can lead to re-purchase. Its value is calculated after discounts, deliveries and other costs of the channel, together with an assessment of food quality.

Sprendimai

How to solve these problems

Solution directions linked to specific business area problems they address.

Problem

Menu pricing and profitability are assessed late

Popular dishes may not be profitable enough, and changes to prices or menus are made too late.

Solution direction

Restaurant ingredient cost and waste analytics system

The guide compares the recipe-based need for ingredients to actual consumption. Purchase, inventory and write-down data help explain the differences in cost.

Problem

Ingredient consumption and food waste are seen late

It is difficult to control the cost of dishes, purchases, portions and the result of reducing food waste.

Solution direction

Restaurant ingredient cost and waste analytics system

The guide compares the recipe-based need for ingredients to actual consumption. Purchase, inventory and write-down data help explain the differences in cost.

Problem

Channels promise more orders than kitchen can accept

The customer is promised an unfeasible time even before the order enters production.

Solution direction

Restaurant order and kitchen management system

Kitchen staff receive accepted orders according to their workstations and record the preparation. Load and missing dishes help to adjust the time offered to the customer.

Problem

Order disruptions are dealt with manually

The client gets information late, employees duplicate actions and it is difficult to control the causes of compensation.

Solution direction

Restaurant order and kitchen management system

Kitchen staff receive accepted orders according to their workstations and record the preparation. Load and missing dishes help to adjust the time offered to the customer.

Problem

Accepted orders do not match between kitchen jobs

One part of the order is waiting for the other, being re-produced or transferred at the wrong time.

Solution direction

Restaurant order and kitchen management system

Kitchen staff receive accepted orders according to their workstations and record the preparation. Load and missing dishes help to adjust the time offered to the customer.

Problem

Direct ordering channel weaker than delivery platforms

The share of platform commissions increases, and the restaurant loses its direct relationship with the customer.

Solution direction

Restaurant direct ordering and loyalty portal

The customer directly orders food for pick-up or delivery according to the current menu and the time offered. He sees payment, order progress and applicable loyalty terms.

Criteria for assessing the investment

Investment justified

The actual consumption of ingredients does not match the recipes and quantity of dishes sold.
Changes to ingredients, recipes, or dishes add-ons do not uniformly reach the kitchen and sales channels.
Visitor flows are changing dramatically, and shifts require staff with different competencies.
The restaurant has regular customers whose direct orders are accepted by telephone or text and rewritten manually.
Orders from the hall, living room and delivery channels go to the same kitchen.

Implementation requirements

Power solutions require harmonised cash register, prescriptions and stock data. Promised preparation time and cost accounting are combined according to the kitchen model, division differences and contractual requirements.

Restaurant or cafe with on-site service

Link the course of the cash register and kitchen with actual recipes and raw material consumption.

Multi-Department Catering Network

Combine general versions of products and production and stock facts for each unit.

Delivery and take-away kitchen

Describe the return of order execution and actual capacity to sales channels.

Contract and event catering

Link menus, approved portions quantities and preparation plan to the conditions of the institution or event.

Key implementation requirements

Menu, shift and production

The recipe and menu solution controls composition and publication; the order progress controls the production of that day; the staff plan prepares the future shift.

Consumption and waste

Theoretical consumption, actual stock change and separately weighed food waste have different accounts. The stock of the plate cannot be written off a second time as an additional consumed ingredient of the same.

Limits to allergen information

The absence of allergen in the recipe ingredient list does not prove the absence of cross contact in the kitchen. The replacement is judged by its true composition.

The Channel Economy

The direct channel economy includes payment, attraction, packaging, delivery and service. A lower platform commission alone does not guarantee higher profits.

Operational performance indicators

Not relevant in menu ordernumber of orders

Count sales based on already altered inappropriate information.

Preparation delayminutes

Compare with the time promised at the reception without rewriting it.

Avoidable wastekg per hundred portions

Use a uniform measurement volume and a comparable menu.

Recurring direct restaurant bookings revenueEUR

The revenue from repeated direct orders of the same customers after discounts is compared. Channel replacement, delivery costs and margin are assessed separately.

Part of the negative feedback on restaurant booking preparation%

When a company starts collecting reviews, negative reviews about the preparation of a restaurant order are counted from all assessments received on the subject. The same method of evaluation is applied before and after installation and similar customer groups are compared. Without initial data, the actual change is not determined.

Key risks

The replacement is considered the same compositionA similar ingredient name hides the allergen change.How to manage Check its specification and actual production conditions before use and publication.
Loss is counted twiceThe remainder of the plate is additionally written off from the ingredients of the portion already consumed.How to manage Separate the stock balance from the physical measurement of waste.

Discuss the progress of your service

Let's talk

Restaurants and catering companies: an analysis of digitalization

Operating model

Restaurant or cafe with on-site service

Multi-Department Catering Network

Delivery and take-away kitchen

Contract and event catering

Market context

Workflow and responsibilities

Menu and need

Preparation

Order acceptance

Production and transmission

Consumption verification

Digital maturity scale

Separate records and manual work

Organised data within individual teams

Partially integrated systems

Coordinated systems and teams

Continuous measurement and improvement

Executive conclusion

Related digitalisation topics

Common digitalisation challenges

Channels promise more orders than kitchen can accept

Direct ordering channel weaker than delivery platforms

Menu pricing and profitability are assessed late

Employee graphs don't respond well to channel demand

Order disruptions are dealt with manually

Menus, recipes, allergens and prices do not match between channels

Accepted orders do not match between kitchen jobs

Ingredient consumption and food waste are seen late

Guest profile and order history fragmented

Rules for Collections and Attachments do not access channels correctly

Opportunities to improve operations

The kitchen is prepared according to expected orders

Business impact assessment

How to solve these problems

Recommended solutions

Restaurant ingredient cost and waste analytics system

Restaurant order and kitchen management system

Restaurant direct ordering and loyalty portal

Restaurant shift and kitchen work planning system

Restaurant menu, recipe and allergen management system

Criteria for assessing the investment

Implementation requirements

Restaurant or cafe with on-site service

Multi-Department Catering Network

Delivery and take-away kitchen

Contract and event catering

Key implementation requirements

Menu, shift and production

Consumption and waste

Limits to allergen information

The Channel Economy

Operational performance indicators

Key risks

Innovation and practical applications

Food waste measurement and image classification

Demand forecast by dish and time

Frequently asked questions

Is one order queue suitable for all power models?

Does the prescription information guarantee safety for an allergic person?

When is a separate shift optimization needed?

How do you compare the profitability of direct orders and intermediary channels?

Discuss the progress of your service