Can all assets be valued at the same frequency?

The frequency and method of valuation depends on the asset and purpose. The date of the last valuation of illiquid assets must remain visible so that it is not considered to be the current market price.

Why are position figures different between systems?

They can display transactions made, assets already settled, or accounting status. Compatible purpose and time, only then investigating an unexplained difference.

Does the mandate verification confirm the suitability of the individual recommendation?

It checks the rules and investment limits passed on to it. The assessment of the suitability of the client's situation and service has its own process and relevance check.

When does AI make sense to the research system?

When it assists in defined work with authorized sources, and the conclusion is verified against the original. Access to read material does not in itself entitle it to use for teaching or to distribute it to others.

LT Let's Connect

Industry digitalisation analysis

Digitalization of Investment and Asset Management Companies

Checking portfolio reports and clearer communication with the client

Digital maturity Typical digital maturity Shows the level of digitalisation companies in this line of business typically operate at. The assessment considers use of core systems, how far processes are digitalised, integrations, data readiness and advanced use of data. A 3 means ordinary, middling maturity. A 5 is given only where real-time data, automated decisions and advanced optimisation are already a routine part of core operations.: high
Digitalisation potential Digitalisation potential Shows the scale of business impact digitalisation could have in this line of business. It weighs economic leverage, the scope for digital impact, the scale and repetition of processes, value lost today, and the leverage of better data and decisions. A business area’s score is calculated from five weighted dimensions. A sector’s score is derived from the scores of its business areas.: 70/100
Biggest challenge: A change in mandate or policy does not reach the portfolio boundaries
Biggest opportunity: Faster and easier-to-explain portfolio reports

Operating model

Funds, individual portfolios and private equity investments vary in asset valuation and data update rate. Businesses need different access to their capital management than to serve external customers.

Management of exchange traded funds

The manager tracks financial instruments and the investment limits set in the fund documents. Transactions made and settlements already made are accounted for according to their actual dates.

Management of private equity and other less-sold assets

Investments are valued at specified periods according to the chosen methodology. Investors' liabilities, actual contributions and payouts are tracked separately.

Individual portfolio management

Each client's portfolio is managed according to its objectives, agreed limits and mandates. Reports distinguish the result of investments from the client's contributions and payouts.

Company's own funds investment

The team evaluates investment opportunities according to the company's policies and management decisions. Stored analyses, reasons for choice and subsequent investment reviews.

Market context

The asset manager team combines position accounting, investment decisions, restriction control and reporting to clients. An understandable explanation of the portfolio result is important to the investor, and the team is provided with comparable and cross-checked data. Analytics helps to evaluate choices according to agreed methodology.

Comparable ReportsContributions, payouts, value change, and fees must be clearly separated in order for the customer to understand the outcome.
Different Data UpdatesExchange instruments and less frequently valued assets require different valuation dates and verification.

Workflow and responsibilities

Mandate and Analysis

The investment limits allowed and the research basis available at the time of the decision are determined.

Decision and Commitment

Checks selected position, pending orders and specific restrictions.

Checking operations and positions

Trade, settlement and accounting facts are maintained separately.

Evaluation and result

Adapted to the type of asset and the methodology of price and return appropriate for the purpose.

Report and follow-up

A verified result is issued, correction explained and necessary assumptions updated.

Digital maturity scale

Separate records and manual work

Information is mainly held in separate files or notes. Employees pass it on and reconcile it manually.

Organised data within individual teams

Teams record their work consistently, but sharing information with colleagues still requires considerable manual checking.

Partially integrated systems

Core work is managed in systems. Some information is transferred automatically, but repeated data entry remains.

Coordinated systems and teams

Systems deliver the required data on time. Employees can see unfinished work and know who is responsible for resolving discrepancies.

Continuous measurement and improvement

The team checks data quality, evaluates results and uses them to improve operations. Automation is applied where its value can be demonstrated.

Executive conclusion

Reliablely matched position, price and cash flow data facilitate reporting. The specialist must be able to explain discrepancies and the result presented to the customer.

Common digitalisation challenges in this business activity

A change in mandate or policy does not reach the portfolio boundaries

High

Following a client review or change in investment policy, restrictions on a specific portfolio are not always updated.

Consequences: Investments can be checked against outdated or other portfolio rules.

Position and price differences have no explained purpose

High

Sources of trade, settlement, accounting and valuation are compared without showing the time, state and method used.

Consequences: The team corrects a reasonable difference or misses a true discrepancy between the operation and the evaluation.

Trade and risk controls are not always integrated

High

Prior to a new commitment, all relevant orders, portfolio positions and current limits are not verified. When the market changes, it is unclear who has to review the deviation.

Consequences: As a result, the overshoot may go unnoticed, and the false warning - unresolved.

Customer and regulatory reports are prepared manually

High

The report's data, commentary, and scope applied to the recipient are not linked to the same accepted release version.

Consequences: An unexplained difference is provided to the client or other recipient, and the correction does not reach all affected addressees.

The basis for calculating taxes and returns is not harmonised

High

Calculations for the same purpose use different versions of positions, valuations, cash flows and rules.

Consequences: The return or charge is not restored, and the reports give rise to differences in the allegedly equal rate.

Uncertain origins and licenses of investment data

High

Data used for analysis is not always visible source, date and allowed purpose. This data may be lost when copying to another calculation.

Consequences: The report may be based on an outdated meaning or be submitted in a non-compliance with the terms of use. The analyst has to re-check the basis before explaining the result to the customer.

Analysis prepared by AI has no verifiable source and review

High

The AI summary does not always make it clear which conclusion is based on a specific source, and which is the generalization of the model.

Consequences: Misuse or unauthorized use of information may result in the client's report. It is then difficult to explain the basis for the conclusion and determine which submissions need to be corrected.

Investment Analysis Distributed in Documents

Medium

The investment idea, assumptions of the model, and sources available at the time of the decision are not tied to an accepted or rejected option.

Consequences: The analysis or subsequent explanation is based on information as yet unknown at the time.

Opportunities

Opportunities to improve operations

Investment reporting and publication systemHigh impactThe report data and commentary are compatible before submission to the customer.Readjustments are declining and the accepted correction can be passed on to all affected recipients.

Investment position and data reconciliation systemHigh impactPosition differences are presented along with their time, status and data source.The analyst explains the discrepancy more quickly and prepares a suitable basis for evaluation and reporting.

Investment research and analytical model management systemHigh impactThe analyst finds what sources and assumptions were used to make the previous decision.There is less repetition of the study, and new information is valued without changing the logic of historical decision.

Investment portfolio limit monitoring systemHigh impactThe order is checked in conjunction with already accepted portfolio obligations.There is a decrease in manual border checks and no observed overshoots that would then need to be examined or corrected.

Biggest opportunity

Faster and easier-to-explain portfolio reports

The specialist checks positions, valuation dates, client contributions and fees. Verified data is used for the report, and the observed difference is shown for review so that the numbers provided to the client do not have to be corrected later.

Less manual reporting collection
Faster verification of data differences
Clearer explanation of portfolio changes
The client can understand the changes in the report, the fees and the basis for their calculation

Business impact assessment

Potential operational benefitsRelevant positions, limits and sources reduce manual reviews and lack of information.
Why the problem mattersAn outdated position or client mandate clause may result in an improper order or report.
Implementation dependenciesIt is necessary to reconcile transaction, settlement and accounting dates and to preserve the calculation data used.
Clearer communication with the investorA report with verified calculations and matched comments helps the client understand portfolio changes. The quality of the information is assessed separately from the investment return.

Sprendimai

How to solve these problems

Solution directions linked to specific business area problems they address.

Problem

Position and price differences have no explained purpose

The team corrects a reasonable difference or misses a true discrepancy between the operation and the evaluation.

Solution direction

Investment position and data reconciliation system

Specialists compare investment position, price and settlement data from different systems. Non-conformities are passed through for verification to use matched figures in reports.

Problem

The basis for calculating taxes and returns is not harmonised

The return or charge is not restored, and the reports give rise to differences in the allegedly equal rate.

Solution direction

Investment position and data reconciliation system

Specialists compare investment position, price and settlement data from different systems. Non-conformities are passed through for verification to use matched figures in reports.

Problem

Uncertain origins and licenses of investment data

The report may be based on an outdated meaning or be submitted in a non-compliance with the terms of use. The analyst has to re-check the basis before explaining the result to the customer.

Solution direction

Investment position and data reconciliation system

Specialists compare investment position, price and settlement data from different systems. Non-conformities are passed through for verification to use matched figures in reports.

Problem

A change in mandate or policy does not reach the portfolio boundaries

Investments can be checked against outdated or other portfolio rules.

Solution direction

Investment portfolio limit monitoring system

The portfolio manager checks the orders against the investment limits set for the client or fund. The observed deviations are forwarded to the responsible employee for evaluation and resolution.

Problem

Trade and risk controls are not always integrated

As a result, the overshoot may go unnoticed, and the false warning - unresolved.

Solution direction

Investment portfolio limit monitoring system

The portfolio manager checks the orders against the investment limits set for the client or fund. The observed deviations are forwarded to the responsible employee for evaluation and resolution.

Problem

Customer and regulatory reports are prepared manually

An unexplained difference is provided to the client or other recipient, and the correction does not reach all affected addressees.

Solution direction

Investment reporting and publication system

The team prepares an investment report, verifies the calculations and aligns the comments. The approved version is passed to the recipient, and subsequent corrections are saved along with the previous report.

Criteria for assessing the investment

Investment justified

Two consultants submit separately threshold-compliant orders, but control excludes the first commitment that has not yet been fulfilled.
The comment given to the client explains the return of the previous version, although the table already uses a corrected result.
An unaccounted purchase is considered a position error because it compares to a source that only shows the assets settled.
The team finds the final presentation, but not the model assumptions on which the investment committee made the decision.

Implementation requirements

Investment management decisions are matched by data moments, valuation methods, cash flows and applicable mandates. The course of reports, orders and research is applied to the responsibility of liquid, illiquid or equity management.

Liquid Financial Instruments Fund Manager

Link order checks, actual positions and versions of approved reports.

Private equity, debt or other illiquid assets manager

Develop a link between liabilities, valuation changes and cash flow data.

Individual portfolio manager

Align how changes to the investment mandate are passed on to transaction control and client reporting.

Equity-investing company

Describe the capital allocation decisions and a subsequent review of their assumptions.

Key implementation requirements

Purpose of the position

The data layer separates the purposes of trading, settlement, accounting and valuation. Their reasonable difference must not be eliminated merely by striving for an equal number.

Source of calculation

It is agreed which system calculates fees and investment result according to the approved methodology. The analysis preserves the data and results it used, and the report receives these figures without converting them according to individual formulas.

Mandate application

The fund's investment limits, individual client mandate and equity policy have different application bases; mere compliance with a technical limit does not prove the suitability of the entire service for the client.

Boundaries of authority

An exception is only allowed where a specific limit and authorization allows it. The mandatory limit is not lifted by the general manual approval button.

Release of the report

The published version of the report, the date of evaluation and known data deficiencies are preserved. Correction is approved and presented as a new version, leaving the previous document in history.

Source of investigation

The analyst preserves the sources and assumptions on which the recommendation was based. Using artificial intelligence checks whether the sources are available legally and whether they confirm the answer.

The Return Method

Portfolio value growth can include external cash contribution.The return method, currency, taxes and cash flow timing must be selected according to the purpose of the valuation.

Operational performance indicators

Explanation of position differencehours

Measure reconciliation of data and operations for the same position purpose.

Correction of the report due to data errornumber of reports

Separating the error from the legitimate update of the later received evaluation.

Unexamined Limit Deviationnumber of cases

Separating an active transaction from the passive deviation caused by the market price.

Part of negative feedback on clarity of investment reports%

When a company starts collecting reviews, negative feedback about the clarity of investment reports is counted from all assessments received on the topic. The same method of assessment applies before and after installation and similar customer groups are compared. Without initial data, the actual change is not determined.

Key risks

Incorrect comparison of returnsCustomer contributions or different assessment dates are supported by a result created by the manager.How to manage Save cash flow and the proper return method and comparison volume.
The study is based on a later finding of factThe historical conclusion is assessed using data then not yet available.How to manage Mark the time of publication and use of the source and the original version of the solution.

Discuss the progress of your financial service

Let's talk

Digitalization of Investment and Asset Management Companies

Operating model

Management of exchange traded funds

Management of private equity and other less-sold assets

Individual portfolio management

Company's own funds investment

Market context

Workflow and responsibilities

Mandate and Analysis

Decision and Commitment

Checking operations and positions

Evaluation and result

Report and follow-up

Digital maturity scale

Separate records and manual work

Organised data within individual teams

Partially integrated systems

Coordinated systems and teams

Continuous measurement and improvement

Executive conclusion

Related digitalisation topics

Common digitalisation challenges in this business activity

A change in mandate or policy does not reach the portfolio boundaries

Position and price differences have no explained purpose

Trade and risk controls are not always integrated

Customer and regulatory reports are prepared manually

The basis for calculating taxes and returns is not harmonised

Uncertain origins and licenses of investment data

Analysis prepared by AI has no verifiable source and review

Investment Analysis Distributed in Documents

Opportunities to improve operations

Faster and easier-to-explain portfolio reports

Business impact assessment

How to solve these problems

Recommended solutions

Investment position and data reconciliation system

Investment portfolio limit monitoring system

Investment reporting and publication system

Investment research and analytical model management system

Criteria for assessing the investment

Implementation requirements

Liquid Financial Instruments Fund Manager

Private equity, debt or other illiquid assets manager

Individual portfolio manager

Equity-investing company

Key implementation requirements

Purpose of the position

Source of calculation

Mandate application

Boundaries of authority

Release of the report

Source of investigation

The Return Method

Operational performance indicators

Key risks

Innovation and practical applications

AI help in comparing investment research sources

Portfolio Risk Explanation Aid

Frequently asked questions

Can all assets be valued at the same frequency?

Why are position figures different between systems?

Does the mandate verification confirm the suitability of the individual recommendation?

When does AI make sense to the research system?

Discuss the progress of your financial service