Sustainability target implementation management system
The team turns approved sustainability goals into specific tasks, deadlines and responsibilities. It sees the progress of the work and can independently verify the result achieved.
Recommendations and objectives lack a customer-approved action, a baseline for measuring results and an assigned owner. The report is complete, but responsibility for assessing implementation remains unclear.
How the solution works
- The source of the claim or purpose is linked to the client's activities, period and application conclusion.
- The client accepts the action, responsibility, resource need and the appropriate base for the result.
- The enforcer records progress, obstacles and provides documents or other data to support the work done.
- The resulting indicator is checked against a comparable volume and separated from the completion of the task.
- A changed requirement or result assumption returns specific actions for review.
Key challenges
- Sustainability goals and recommendations separated from the real action plan
- Changes in regulatory requirements hand-translated to customer tasks
Solution capabilities
Conclusion on application
The modified source has editorial, entry into force and application conditions; the status of the project or proposal is separated from the valid requirement.
Commitment accepted by the customer
The action has an executor, a deadline, the resources required and a clear limit to the coordination of the consultant.
Execution Link
The task is linked to the company's project or work system. Its performance status is updated from that system so that teams do not see different results.
Goal and result base
Progress is measured by an approved indicator and the extent of the comparison, distinguishing between the change in methodology.
Impact and Exception Review
Overlays, delays or changed applications of initiatives receive a responsible decision, not automatic marking of success.
Business context
- Sustainability goals and recommendations separated from the real action plan
- Recommendations and objectives lack a customer-approved action, a baseline for measuring results and an assigned owner. The report is complete, but responsibility for assessing implementation remains unclear.
- Changes in regulatory requirements hand-translated to customer tasks
- The modified claim does not relate to the terms of application, expiration time and expert's conclusion of a particular client. The assignment of the task is made too late or the customer is subject to an obligation beyond his/her control.
- The client sees how his/her obligations are fulfilled
- An approved sustainability goal can be important for the customer's relationship with the buyer or investor. Specific responsible persons and performance data help to show progress and discuss delays in a timely manner. Continuing implementation assistance can be based on clear work and agreed responsibilities when such service is included in the consultant's order.
Core features
- Conclusion on application
- Commitment accepted by the customer
- Execution Link
- Goal and result base
- Impact and Exception Review
Key integrations
- Official sources of claims
- Editorial, status and validity information for the review of expert application.
- Client Projects and Tasks progress
- Task, its principal, obstacles and a document or record confirming performance.
- Indicator data
- Approved version of the result and base with its scope.
- Financial data
- The resources accepted and the real costs of the initiative chosen.
Potential impact (%)
The ranges indicate an illustrative relative change in the metric under the stated assumptions. Results depend on the starting position and actual use of the solution. Percentages for different metrics must not be added together.
Review work on the application of the requirement change
12–36%Decreasing
This illustrative scenario assumes that 30-60% of manual data entry and handover work can be addressed. That share is assumed to fall by 40-60%. Company data is needed to verify both the addressable workload and the resulting change.
An expert's revision to a reasonable decision is measured, which clients and actions the change applies to.
Objectives adopted without action being taken
5–25%Decreasing
This illustrative scenario assumes that 20-50% of missed actions can be identified through task and deadline tracking. That share is assumed to fall by 25-50%. Company data is needed to verify both the addressable share and the resulting change.
Goals are calculated, the agreed review of which does not find either an ongoing action or a reasonable solution to the postponement.
Conditional calculation scenarios. The assumptions have not been validated against client measurements.
When this solution is relevant
- The sustainability requirements for different clients or objects are checked separately by the team.
- The reports show the projects carried out, but it is unclear if they have helped meet the sustainability targets set.
Implementation requirements
The course of implementation of the requirements requires approved application conclusions, objectives and responsible executors. The client is compatible where the works are assigned, how evidence of their performance is obtained and who evaluates the result using task management tools that are already in place.
Further development options
- Reviewing the application of additional clients while preserving the differences between each activity and period
- Options for a portfolio of initiatives based on verified cost and result assumptions