Site technical inspection and nonconformity management system
The specialist registers the technical problem noticed in the facility and passes it to repair. The result checked and the necessary changes reach the project documents.
Site or operation notes are recorded in separate reports, photographs and contractor systems. Models and organization knowledge do not reflect realistically implemented solutions, and the same errors recur.
How the solution works
- Capture the fact and urgency of a specific place
- Identify non-compliance and responsible action under the mandate
- Perform repairs or pass the need for technical replacement
- Verify sufficient proof of rectification
- Complete the case and pass the required change in actual documentation
Key challenges
- Object discrepancies and actual state do not return to design data
Solution capabilities
Location and fact
The object, zone or element, time and significant note are recorded in such a way that they can be verified on-site. Not every object needs a three-dimensional model.
Emergency Response
The potential threat is transmitted according to the local safety order and actual authority. Recording in the program must not delay the necessary action.
Assignment of a task to the executor
Note has a specific recipient, deadline and answer. The care professional does not get automatic right to change the contractor's contract or the entire work plan.
Correction check
The proof is selected according to non-conformity: a direct examination, measurement or other appropriate action may be required. A photograph alone does not confirm the quality of the hidden work.
Link to the project
If the fix changes the solution, the case is linked to the course of the technical change. The actual documentation is updated by the responsible process, not just by changing the state of the note.
Business context
- Object discrepancies and actual state do not return to design data
- Site or operation notes are recorded in separate reports, photographs and contractor systems. Models and organization knowledge do not reflect realistically implemented solutions, and the same errors recur.
- A proven solution to the technical problem is provided to the customer
- A discrepancy observed in an object can limit the use or start of other work. Linking facts, repair responsibilities, and result verification allow for explanation of progress. Updated project documents help preserve what has been actually changed and accepted.
Core features
- Location and fact
- Emergency Response
- Assignment of a task to the executor
- Correction check
- Link to the project
Key integrations
- Workflow of object and contractor
- Location, designated principal and actual repair response.
- Design Changes and Document Environment
- A solution change and release of updated information is required.
Potential impact (%)
The ranges indicate an illustrative relative change in the metric under the stated assumptions. Results depend on the starting position and actual use of the solution. Percentages for different metrics must not be added together.
Time to response of the responsible employee to non-compliance
6–25%Decreasing
This illustrative scenario assumes that 20-50% of waiting caused by missing information or unclear responsibility can be addressed. That share is assumed to fall by 30-50%. Company data is needed to verify both the addressable share and the resulting change.
Measure the hours between registration of non-compliance and confirmation by the principal that he has begun to organize a correction.
Insufficiently corrected non-conformities
5–25%Decreasing
This illustrative scenario assumes that 20-50% of missed actions can be identified through task and deadline tracking. That share is assumed to fall by 25-50%. Company data is needed to verify both the addressable share and the resulting change.
Count cases reopened due to previously unverified or insufficient correction of the same deficiency.
Conditional calculation scenarios. The assumptions have not been validated against client measurements.
When this solution is relevant
- Observations of inspection of the facility shall be recorded separately from those responsible and the deadlines for correction.
- The work is noted for having been done, but it is unclear who has verified and accepted the result of the correction.
Project scope and implementation
Checks and non-compliances are organized according to the agreed responsibility at the facility. If the service only includes a consultative conclusion, the day-to-day management of contractors' work is not included in the project. The specialist appointed is responsible for accepting the correction.
Further development options
- Additional objects and measurement relationships according to the actual scope of maintenance and the requirement for sufficient proof.