Textile and apparel manufacturing execution system (MES)

The master tracks the order of clothing according to model, size and color. Finished products are visible, quantity is repaired and work is handed over to subcontractors.

The transferred sets, process batches and subcontractor returned quantity are not matched with the broker and additional processing. Execution of the order must be restored by hand, and the same good quantity can be accounted for repeatedly.

How the solution works

  1. The task is linked to the approved model, variant and technological card.
  2. Quantities, sizes and the batch of material involved are recorded during the transfer of the product group.
  3. The employee notes the operation performed, the reason for the wait and correct the amount returned.
  4. The confirmed fact reaches completion and planning; the return of the subcontractor is checked against the transferred quantity.

Key challenges

  • Production data is recorded too late

Solution capabilities

Task by Option

The model, color, size, or batch of product is presented in proper execution detail.

Transfer of groups and quantities

After registering a portion of the quantity done or dividing the group, the products remain linked to the order and the material used.

Correction logging

Additional work has a reason and is not counted as a second-time produced good quantity.

Subcontracting Facts

The amount transferred, returned, unfinished and rejected is separated to a specific task.

Business context

Production data is recorded too late
The transferred sets, process batches and subcontractor returned quantity are not matched with the broker and additional processing. Execution of the order must be restored by hand, and the same good quantity can be accounted for repeatedly.
The collection is presented in the right ratio of sizes and colors
For a trading partner, the total number of units produced does not indicate whether he will be able to deliver the entire range. The visible course of work of specific sizes, colors and subcontractors allows checking the completeness of the order. The seller can reasonably combine the delivery of the collection and explain the missing positions.

Core features

  • Task by Option
  • Transfer of groups and quantities
  • Correction logging
  • Subcontracting Facts

Key integrations

Enterprise resource planning system (ERP)
Production orders, material requirements and return of actual data.
Advanced planning and scheduling system (APS)
The approved plan and the actual state of execution for replanning.
Quality management system (QMS)
Quality states, inspection tasks and detentions.
Equipment data integration layer
Reliable process and condition signals linked to the task, operation and time of work.

Potential impact (%)

The ranges indicate an illustrative relative change in the metric under the stated assumptions. Results depend on the starting position and actual use of the solution. Percentages for different metrics must not be added together.

Targeting between workshops and subcontractors

12–36%Decreasing

This illustrative scenario assumes that 30-60% of manual data entry and handover work can be addressed. That share is assumed to fall by 40-60%. Company data is needed to verify both the addressable workload and the resulting change.

Employee time and unexplained quantity are measured when completing an order.

Unreasonably re-estimated good quantity

12–42%Decreasing

This illustrative scenario assumes that 30-60% of errors can be addressed through the data and rule checks described. That share is assumed to fall by 40-70%. Company data is needed to verify both the addressable share and the resulting change.

The differences in production and final packaging quantities are verified, distinguishing the approved accounting reasons.

Conditional calculation scenarios. The assumptions have not been validated against client measurements.

When this solution is relevant

  • The total order quantity is registered but a specific size or colour set is missing.
  • The quantity transferred and returned to the subcontractor is not matched with the broker and work still in progress.

Project scope and implementation

The project may involve combining workshop and subcontractor records with the production system in use. If an independent execution environment is needed, product options, repair and transfer tasks are defined. Model documents and material accounting are linked to the tools that already control them.

Further development options

  • Cross-checking the cut and final correct quantity
  • Transfer of Order Shortage by Size to Planner

Frequently asked questions

Adapting the solution to your business