Metal manufacturing drawing and technical documentation management system
The technologist combines drawings, materials, machine tool programs and the course of operations. An approved version is transmitted for production with clearly specified changes.
The drawing, material requirement, operations route and machine tool program do not have a verified peer-to-peer version connection. The technological package may not be complete before work begins, so the operator must make the correct documentation themselves.
How the solution works
- The technologist prepares a mutually agreed package of drawing, program and route.
- Production and quality assess the effect of replacement on already cut and started parts.
- The limit of application of the new version and the action with preforms produced in the previous version are confirmed.
- The workplace receives a package valid for a specific order; its reception is verified.
Key challenges
- Production documentation is assembled from inconsistent sources
- Versions of drawings and technological changes achieve production unevenly
Solution capabilities
The composition of the technological package
The drawing, material requirement, computer controlled machine tool program and route are linked to one approved pass.
Impact on work started
The actual status of the operations determines which blanks or assembled items need to be viewed.
Harmonization of Product Changes
The technologist, production and quality staff evaluate the part of the replacement that is relevant to them. They confirm which orders and works already started are covered by the replacement.
Current version at the workstation
The document is presented in order and operation, preserving the history of previous use.
Business context
- Production documentation is assembled from inconsistent sources
- The drawing, material requirement, operations route and machine tool program do not have a verified peer-to-peer version connection. The technological package may not be complete before work begins, so the operator must make the correct documentation themselves.
- Versions of drawings and technological changes achieve production unevenly
- New versions of drawings, tolerances or welding requirements are transmitted via email and files. Produced to an outdated version, with increasing conversions and customer claims.
- Technical proposal conforms to approved drawing
- The industrial developer expects the bid price and production to be based on the same version of the detail. Change control allows to determine whether a new drawing changes material, technology and deadline. The seller can match the terms before production and justify why the bid changed.
Core features
- The composition of the technological package
- Impact on work started
- Harmonization of Product Changes
- Current version at the workstation
Key integrations
- Design and Production Preparation Tools (CAD/CAM)
- Drawing, geometry and approved machine tool program.
- Enterprise resource planning system (ERP)
- Orders, material requirements and operations structure.
- Metalworking manufacturing execution system (MES)
- Status of works started and approval of the version actually used.
- Quality process
- The control plan and the decision on the parts already produced have been affected.
Potential impact (%)
The ranges indicate an illustrative relative change in the metric under the stated assumptions. Results depend on the starting position and actual use of the solution. Percentages for different metrics must not be added together.
Conversion costs due to incorrect version of document
3–14%Decreasing
This illustrative scenario assumes that 15-35% of cost variance can be explained and addressed using the measures described. That share is assumed to fall by 20-40%. Company data is needed to verify both the addressable share and the resulting change.
The material and labor costs attributed to this cause are summed up by comparing orders of similar volume and complexity.
Active time of substitution effect determination
12–36%Decreasing
This illustrative scenario assumes that 30-60% of manual data entry and handover work can be addressed. That share is assumed to fall by 40-60%. Company data is needed to verify both the addressable workload and the resulting change.
Assessment preparation work is measured by the volume of orders and documents affected.
Conditional calculation scenarios. The assumptions have not been validated against client measurements.
When this solution is relevant
- The operator drawing and the device application do not always match the same approved version of the order.
- Once a customer is replaced, it is necessary to manually determine which parts that have already been manufactured or produced are covered by it.
Implementation requirements
For production changes, drawings, workpieces, machine tool programs and control plans are linked. Technologists determine how the application of the change to work already started is validated and how this story is maintained by the document tools used.
Further development options
- Verification of acceptance of the subcontracted version
- Return of a local machine tool program change to a technologist