Forestry operations and regeneration management system
The forest manager plans the work of the plot and passes it to contractors. After restoration, greenery surveys follow and replenish the need for maintenance not to end with planting.
Cadastre, forest management projects, inventory, property, condition of stands, protected areas and actual works are kept on different maps and documents. Planning is based on data of unequal relevance, while field teams and owners see a different state of the plot.
How the solution works
- Plot data and applicable conditions are used to prepare forest work.
- The contractor shall provide the volume carried out, which the manager verifies and accepts.
- The restoration work is extended by greenery surveys and a reasonable plan of necessary replenishment.
Key challenges
- Forest plots and stands data outdated or unmatched
- The forest works plan is not sufficiently linked to actual execution
- Limitations on biodiversity and the environment not integrated into work tasks
- Smallholder portfolio management depends on individual consultants
- Results of restoration and juvenile care observed fragmentedly
Solution capabilities
Plot and working conditions
The work is associated with a verified location, standby data and valid restrictions.
Contractor's Task
The executor receives the agreed scope of the work, the deadline and the necessary information when seeing subsequent changes.
Reception of works
The manager checks the actual result and cost, separating the contractor's submission from the work accepted.
History of Restoration
The planting site, the material used and the volume carried out remain linked to a specific restoration work.
Care of the greenery after planting
During the inspection, the condition of the plantings is recorded and additional work is required. They are assigned an executor, a deadline and subsequent verification.
Business context
- Forest plots and stands data outdated or unmatched
- Cadastre, forest management projects, inventory, property, condition of stands, protected areas and actual works are kept on different maps and documents. Planning is based on data of unequal relevance, while field teams and owners see a different state of the plot.
- The forest works plan is not sufficiently linked to actual execution
- Cuts, education, road and ditches maintenance, planting, protection, contractors, machinery, permits and actual areas are managed differently. It is difficult to control the scope, quality, terms, environmental boundaries and contractor settlement of works.
- Limitations on biodiversity and the environment not integrated into work tasks
- Habitat, protected species, water protection zones, recreational functions, soil and seasonal restrictions are presented in separate layers or documents. The contractor can obtain incomplete information, the risk of damage, work stoppages and compliance increases.
- Smallholder portfolio management depends on individual consultants
- Documents, terms, works, income, taxes and owner decisions of many small parcels are managed by email and personal files. A service company or cooperative struggles to increase the number of owners served and consistently communicates the value of a portfolio.
- Results of restoration and juvenile care observed fragmentedly
- Planting material, species, areas of work, access, beast damage, plantation maintenance and re-works are not in a single multi-year history. Problems are noticed too late, it is difficult to compare contractors and choose the most suitable method of restoration.
- Forest owner can track the outcome of agreed works
- It is important for the owner to understand what the contractor has done and what maintenance will be needed next. The work, reception and greenery surveys associated with the site allow for an explanation of the progress. The service provider can justify further needs for the work according to the actual state of the forest.
Core features
- Plot and working conditions
- Contractor's Task
- Reception of works
- History of Restoration
- Care of the greenery after planting
Key integrations
- Sources of plots, plans and restrictions
- Geometry, law and applicable information.
- Contracts, Contracts and Accounting
- The fact of work, reception and the cost assigned to the owner.
- Sources of forest works and plantings
- Actual work, material and specific location.
- Condition checks
- Method, sampling locations, violation and maintenance solution.
Potential impact (%)
The ranges indicate an illustrative relative change in the metric under the stated assumptions. Results depend on the starting position and actual use of the solution. Percentages for different metrics must not be added together.
Work on the reconciliation of work acceptance
16–42%Decreasing
This illustrative scenario assumes that 40-70% of information searches and repeated cross-checks can be addressed. That share is assumed to fall by 40-60%. Company data is needed to verify both the addressable workload and the resulting change.
Measure working minutes for the specific contractor's job acceptance check.
Timely unchecked recovery area
5–25%Decreasing
This illustrative scenario assumes that 20-50% of missed actions can be identified through task and deadline tracking. That share is assumed to fall by 25-50%. Company data is needed to verify both the addressable share and the resulting change.
Count areas with an agreed status check omitted.
Conditional calculation scenarios. The assumptions have not been validated against client measurements.
When this solution is relevant
- Forest work is carried out by several contractors and the boundaries, tasks and acceptance documents of the parcels are passed on separately.
- Subsequent inspections and maintenance need to be planned after planting, but their history has been broken down.
Project scope and implementation
The project includes plot tasks, contractor performance records and subsequent recovery surveys. Available maps and registers are used; work without the Internet is separately compatible. If an existing work system supports this, its customization and data interconnection may be sufficient.